High-performing teams, Part II - Being proactive

There is not one thing which creates a high-performing team (HPT). Trying to define the numerous aspects of an HPT culture took me an entire blog post. However, being proactive is one key attribute required for all individuals of a high-performing team.

Doing what is expected
My prior post discussed team growth expectations. In order to achieve continuous growth, each individual simply doing what is expected of them is not enough for achieving HPT status.

Take a software developer, for example. They are expected to create X features working on Y product while collaborating with their teammates. They are expected to complete those features on time, follow proper standards, and ensure their code is efficient and secure. That is the baseline. That is expected of them each and every day. While that may sound great, my view is if everyone on the team did that year after year team growth would be stagnant. (And it may get boring for the developer!)

Being proactive
Being proactive is the key to unlock exponential growth and creativity in both individuals and teams.

The definition of proactive:

Creating or controlling a situation by causing something to happen rather than responding to it after it has happened.

Take a software developer again as an example: They can be proactive in numerous ways, including identifying a new solution to a problem the team is facing (without being told, of course), implementing it, and organizing a lunch-and-learn session to ensure everyone is aware and understands the new way forward.

The key is for individuals to take the initiative in looking for ways they can help improve themselves, the team, and the company. This is often where new and creative ideas emerge, which naturally leads to learning and mastery.

The proactive expectation (and contradiction?)
I argue being proactive is therefore expected of all team members.

Does this mean, however, any proactive work is then simply viewed as par for the course? Does this mean no individual can ever be seen as going above-and-beyond?

No. The beauty of being proactive is while it is expected of everyone, there are so many ways in which it can be done. Therefore, it is impossible to define exactly how to do it, so it can never be explicitly expected.

What motivates us

Daniel Pink challenges the conventional way of thinking about motivation. He points to research demonstrating larger rewards do not necessarily lead to better performance for tasks involving conceptual and creative thinking.

So what does motivate us?

Autonomy
No one likes a micro-manager. When things are 100% planned it equates to zero innovation. Self-direction, on the other hand, drives engagement.

Software company Atlassian provides developers 24 hours once a quarter to work on whatever they want, however they want. The only thing they must do is show their results to the company at the end of the 24 hours. This quarterly event has produced many new products, bug fixes, and productivity improvements which may never have emerged otherwise.

Mastery
Why do people play musical instruments? I learned to play the piano after college, not because I was getting paid for it (I wasn't), but because I enjoyed doing it and seeing my progress along the way.

Open source projects are another example here (think Wikipedia or Linux). Contributors to these projects do not get paid, many already have jobs, but challenge and mastery spark their desire to contribute.

Purpose
We want to be a part of something bigger than ourselves. This goes hand-in-hand with my post about the power of "why."

Skype's founder said, "Our goal is to be disruptive, but in the cause of making the world a better place." That is quite a purpose to get up and go to work for every day.

It is important to note that money is in fact a motivator. If you pay someone too little, that can be severely de-motivating. Pay someone enough to get the issue of money off the table and they can focus solely on their work.